This was an undertaking for my journalism class--I am fascinated with the idea of composing music and have tried (and a pretty feeble attempt at that) to compose my own stuff. I loved this assignment and hearing from different composers my own age who are learning how to make it come alive.
Samuel G. Freedman, in his book
Letters to a Young Journalist, writes: “There is something daring, then, in believing, as I believe, that journalism must do more than pander to prejudices. There is something daring in letting your own attitudes and orthodoxies rub up against inconvenient realities. There is something daring in taking on a burden of expertise, proving by your own example that being a journalist means more than putting up a Web site and saying you are.” While Freedman was talking about the written language and the act of investigative journalism, his message can be applied to any art form that is losing its place in concrete places. Creativity that once belonged on the stage, in the museum, and the in concert halls are being transferred to youtube, ebay, and iTunes, and Freedman asks his readers to dare to be different. Dare to not buy in to what is simply efficient. Dare to still seek quality with the digital age, and perhaps even despite it. He is asking us to create.
The first vinyl record my father ever owned was the Beatle’s
Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Heart Club. It was ranked number one in the
Rolling Stone’s feature “the 500 Greatest Albums of All Time,” sold over eight million copies worldwide over several years, and was quoted as being “an unsurpassed work of concept, sound, and songwriting.” The album, released in 1967, had to be bought with dollars and cents at an actual record store. This meant that people actually had to get dressed, leave their homes, and pay the original listed price to get a portable playlist of their favorite tunes. Once purchased, getting the album home was another ordeal. Too bulky to carry in one’s pockets or bag, the record would have to be carried in both hands to a playing device either the size of a microwave or a small refrigerator before it could be enjoyed. If it were scratched, broken, or dirtied, the songs simply stopped playing.
The modern mind reels.
Forty two years later, I too purchased from my first big hit album. It was Lady Gaga’s “Poker Face,” which amassed an incredible ten million copies in less than one year, at least half of which were downloaded online. In the comfort of my pajamas, I logged into iTunes, dragged the digital track to my digital shopping cart, and headed to check out. There were no lines. No pushing or shoving at the counter. No risk of scratching or dirtying the cover. And within seconds the song was transferred literally into my pocket to be sung along with as I got ready for school. In less than two minutes I was able to own a song of relatively larger popularity for cheaper and enjoy it sooner than my father could have at the same age.
But perhaps “own” is the wrong word. John Lennon himself was quoted as saying: “Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it.” This is precisely the mindset of music consumers today. Songs are streamed, pirated, uploaded, downloaded, traded, created, enhanced, and produced on a far wider and faster scale than in any other time in history. There are literally thousands of opportunities to swindle, share, discover, change, and enjoy the complex international language of music, and all that is needed is a little monitor and an Internet connection.
From this viewpoint, with the tools of music globally accessible to the public at large, it is hard to make room for old technology like vinyls, eight tracks, tape players, and CDs. Just as typewriters and pen and ink made way for digital processing and newspapers are making way to Internet news feeds and blogs, music, as another form of language, is now taking its turn to digitalization. The art of creating a new song is as simple as entering a few notes into a software program, synchronizing them together with digital beats and instrumentation, and printing off the finished product. This is how it’s done for hundreds of commercial jingles, vlog channels, video games, and even concert music for band students.
All of these advancements beg the question: does anyone make real music anymore? Is the future of music cutting and copying pre-made beats and spending more time with keyboard and mouse then piano keys, instruments, creativity, and pen and paper? Will inspiration dwindle and be replaced by online commercial supply and demand?
I know at least five people who refuse to let that become the future. They are individuals who still find inspiration in themselves, their friends, the world around them, and even in God. They are the few who for their own personal reasons and in their own way bring music to life and compose their message into new songs with depth and ingenuity. They are the few who dare to create.
Ian Troester-Solbrig is a student at ISU in Pocatello and one of the lead songwriters for a band he formed called “Walther’s Wallpaper,” specializing in ska and alternative music. He records and distributes much of his music on the Internet, and his band has its own page on Facebook with videos of their latest performances for fans to view. While this seems a complete embrace of the technological age of efficiency, consider this: when Ian composes a song, he treats it like an investigative journalist treats a breaking story. In lieu of a laptop or blackberry, he uses a notebook and a recorder to capture his ideas. He tape records musical phrases, chords, and bits of tunes that he is working on and then listens to them over again with paper and pencil in hand. In this way he is able to write and rewrite lyrics that fit the emotions he is trying to convey, and more often than not the initial rough copy of a song is a jumble of words and chords on paper. Only after this process has been tempered with to satisfaction is it put into a computer music program and saved for printing.
“There is no right or wrong in music composition,” Ian explains, “you’ve got to experiment beyond the confines of what you’ve already heard. I like to think that my songs reflect who I am and provide an artistic framework for me to explore my emotions, my philosophies, and my possible reactions to alternate realities.” In other words, Ian doesn’t have to cater to online popularity or use the techniques that are the most efficient to make music. He uses his own timetable and his own resources to create songs that are personal, interesting, and inspired.
Anna Chapman and Ricardo Osuna share similar views. Both music composition majors at College of Idaho, the two compose through their emotions to produce music developed for their own ideas and inspiration rather than to any specific audience. “When I start out writing a song or a piece I’m never sure if it’ll work out,” Ricardo admits, “I always start with a feeling or emotion in mind, then try to write a melody that I feel captures that feeling or emotion.” For Ricardo this means a lot of starting new projects before finishing original ones; constantly shifting directions until the music finally fits into place. The hardest part about this kind of composing is that there is no employer or online review to provide instant feedback on the songs, so Ricardo must become his own critic, and this often makes it harder to find confidence in personal music style.
But this doesn’t stop him from continuing to grow and develop as a composer, and as he does so he turns to the computer more and more often. That isn’t to say that he lets the program do the work for him. On the contrary, it takes a great deal of knowledge in improvisation and music theory to be able to layer the parts of a song and make it professional and complex. The process of making a jingle or a simple tune takes only the knowledge of clicking certain buttons in a certain order. But the results have no depth to them, and cannot convey the kind of emotions and inspiration that composers like Ricardo strive for. For educated musicians a composing program acts as an organizer and simpler means of saving projects in a more logical way then paper, so each time Ricardo needs to go back to a past idea and make major changes to it, he can.
Anna also struggles with “composer’s block” and leaving pieces unfinished, but unlike commercial musicians who labor to make their pieces more complex and interesting to listeners, Anna fights to make her pieces less complicated so that her audience can still hear the message underneath. She relies on a composing program called Finale 2009 for most of her music writing, which is considered the standard program for music writing and allows the musician to plug in an electronic keyboard to the computer and play the notes directly into the software. Like Ricardo and Ian, she begins her pieces on paper and then saves them to the software using what she has learned in music theory and research to connect it all together. Because she isn’t writing for a specific agenda or product, she has more creative freedom with her pieces and actually has to put in the effort to harness that creativity.
Think about it. If commercialized song-writers had complete creative liberty there would be no limits to length, content, complexity, instrumentation, or tone. A thirty second jingle for a toilet bowl cleaner might grow into a thirty minute symphony. Radio stations would lose their advertisement investments as the airtime for music grew from a few minutes between commercials to a few hours. There’s a reason that these songs have restrictions. Attention spans are short, particularly on the Internet. So what gives composers like Anna and Ricardo and Ian the advantage over those who write for companies?
The audience difference is obviously a big part of it, but music theory is also one thing that divides those who compose for efficiency from those who compose for themselves. Anna explains it this way: “I’ve heard [music theory] termed ‘informed intuition.,’ and it’s entirely true. A composer knows the theory in the notes and harmonies and is ‘informed,’ yet they must also allow the ear and creativity to guide the composition, which is the ‘intuition.’” Digital technology cannot invent intuition or creativity, nor can it teach the user the music theory skills needed to really operate it.
Anthony Parry is another C of I composition major who combines “informed intuition” and the digitalization of music together without losing the elements of either. “I compose for myself. When I sit down and compose, I get lost for hours. Time doesn’t exist to me anymore, and I completely envelop myself into whatever I’m writing. Music is an escape for me.” Based on this statement, Anthony’s passion for the language of music is clear, and so I was surprised to hear that his hopes for publishing were centered widely on the Internet. There are public domain access programs which allow companies to sample bits of music for use in commercials and production, and Anthony plans to be a part of this media sharing and begin publishing his work for others.
“My love of contemporary popular music has led me to believe that three minute songs will make people happy,” he remarked, and it is this compression and limitation of inspiration in the corporate world that has caused creative minds like Anthony and Rob Walker, a musical instructor at College of Idaho, to seek out employment in the entertainment and advertising agencies. Initially I was dismayed to hear a college student already limiting himself to employment in the mainstream, but listening to the rest of Anthony’s beliefs about composing and the things that inspire him I realized that there was a difference between blindly accepting the shift in what is marketable and remaining true to oneself.
Because Anthony spends time in music classes that help him grow creatively and allows his own talent to be tested with improvisation, and because he continues to write songs so that his own message can be heard, he is already different from the composers who pander only to the consumers. He knows that what sold in the music industry twenty years ago is different from what sells now. Getting hired here and there for advertisement is not only smart financially, it will also get him recognized by other groups who might be willing to publish his longer, inspired compositions for film soundtracks, concerts, and even internationally sold as sheet music for other orchestras and bands to perform world wide. And really, that is what music is for. Sharing the message of one creative mind to hundreds of others.
Rob Walker is no stranger to the corporate world. He has a large number of television and film credits to his name, including
High School Musical III, College Road Trip, Fired Up, Friday Night Lights, The O.C., Ugly Betty, and
Animal Planet; and he also recorded the music for NBC’s Triple Crown Coverage for horse derbies. Rob saw the trends in the composition business and followed them, and was more than accomplished enough as a musician to be given a deadline and an idea for a song and to write something with quality for publication in a short amount of time. But Rob still remains true to himself and his passion for music. As a jazz instructor at the college and an active musician in the community, he often improvises and composes in whatever genre inspires him most simply for the pleasure of bringing new music to life.
When asked what the hardest part of composing music was he replied: “Narrowing down the possibilities. I always use the analogy of asking an artist to create a picture. Go! An artist must make decisions such as watercolor or charcoal, canvas or paper, colorful or dark…once these parameters are set, creating the work is easy.” So although Rob has a hand in fast-paced production of media music, he also takes the time for his own music projects that use different materials and a fresh canvas for his ideas. This past spring he held his own compositional concert at the school to showcase songs he composed for choir, orchestra, band, and jazz alike, most notably of all a tribute to President Lincoln which took weeks of research and piecing together of old 19th century tunes together to create.
As Rob explained, “composers should learn all of the rules and then forget them or attempt to break them.” By selling songs for television and soundtracks, Rob follows a few guidelines and preferences for others, but on the side, he is still feeding his ingenuity with music that defies the standard, stretches limitations, and even makes parodies of media tunes and their simplistic nature.
All five of these individuals have dared to be different, and have worked hard to make their own musical vision continue to develop beyond the restrictions of downloads, deadlines, and distribution. For Ian, music is a love affair that began in his attempts to be the next Jimi Hendrix. For Ricardo, his passion is in the drive to create something that is his own and express himself. To Anna music is more than a part of her, it is a calling and a way to share her feelings for her friends and the world around her. Anthony explained composing as “opening up so many boxes to create feeling and emotion without words,” and finds inspiration in love, in life, and in nature. Rob uses music as an outlet for his ideas, whether professionally or for fun, and constantly keeps a new mental canvas ready for the next project.
While their inspirations and motives differ from one another, each of them agree on one thing: when asked what the most rewarding part of composing music was, each and every one of them replied “hearing it.” Hearing their vision come together and become real, whether in front of an audience of two or two hundred, is what composition is all about.
Sources:
1. "Beatle's Srgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club History". CD Universe. 20 May, 2010
.
2. Chapman, Anna. Interview by e-mail. 27 April, 2010.
3. "Finale".Wikipedia. 20 May, 2010 .
4. Freedman, Samuel G. Letters to a Young Journalist. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2006.
5. "John Lennon Quotes". Great-Quotes-Powerful-Minds.com. 20 May, 2010 .
6. Osuna, Ricardo. Interview by e-mail. 27 April, 2010.
7. Parry, Anthony. Interview by e-mail. 27 April, 2010.
8. "The Fame". Wikipedia. 20 May, 2010 .
9. Troester-Solbrig, Ian. Interview by e-mail. 19 April, 2010.
10. Walker, Rob. Interview by e-mail. 16 April, 2010.